What is your philosophical perspective on art?

The second part deals with interpretation and appreciation, the meaning of art, truth, emotion and expression. The first part deals with the identity of works of art, the possibility of defining art, and the question of whether art is universal for all people. In order to better understand the importance and value of art in philosophical terms and the place of art in philosophy, it is necessary to take a brief look at how thinkers evaluate the activity of art. The task of the philosopher of art is not to increase the understanding and appreciation of works of art, but to provide the critic with a conceptual framework (1) by examining the basic concepts underlying the activities of critics and allowing them to speak and write more intelligibly. than art, and (2) come to true conclusions about art, aesthetic value, expression, and other concepts that critics use.

This aesthetic sense of the term, applied to art or useful art, is most commonly used today by most art critics and philosophers. Art; means all the methods used to express emotion, design, beauty, etc., or the higher creativity resulting from the expression of emotion. The Platonic concept of beauty constitutes a comparatively small part of Kant’s aesthetic theory. Art for Plato falls under the broader theme of aesthetic judgment, which encompasses judgments of the beautiful, judgments of the sublime, and teleological judgments of natural organisms and nature.

As was often the case with ancient philosophers, both Plato and Aristotle were forced to create a theory of art based largely on their metaphysical view of the nature of the world. Although many philosophers before and after Aristotle held opposing attitudes towards the philosophy of art, it is undeniable that in the historical context of Aristotle, his teacher’s theory had much in common with common sense, among which Many still have some merit today click here.

Although Aristotle did not have a rich theory of art to answer the questions that later philosophers would ask. He immediately followed one of the first and most emphasized philosophers in commenting on the nature of art. Plato. The second type of argument, less common today than in the golden age of some form of extreme Wittgensteinism. Calls for the inclusion of concepts that are the essence of most definitions of art (expressiveness, form) within the context of traditional metaphysics. General philosophical theory and epistemology.

Following Davies’s 2003 Themes in the Philosophy of Music and the more introductory. And student-friendly 2006 book Philosophy of Art for Blackwell, in the Foundations of Philosophy of Art series, Davies compiled several less introductory and more challenging essays for his 2007 New Philosophical Perspectives on art.
I certainly find it technically impressive when art can mimic reality. But I have no desire to do it myself and my personal belief is that realism is not the most important aspect of a work of art.

Source: https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/top-5-best-essay-writing-service-reviews-comparative-study-167031 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.